Tuesday
May032011
#WTF: Out of Osama's Death, A Fake Quotation is Born
Tuesday, May 3, 2011 at 12:03AMWHHHHAAAATTTT is going on?!?!!? I was JUST saying this to a friend tonight that SOOOOO many of my friends had posted this MLK quote as their status - I loved it, and thought my friends were totally rad for recognizing that just because this duderino is dead, it doesn't really mean that "justice has been done" etc. etc. etc.
Either way, haha wtf, it's totally phony?
Per The Atlantic: Shortly after I posted my piece on feeling curiously un-thrilled about Bin Laden's death, the following quote came across my twitter feed:
"I mourn the loss of thousands of precious lives, but I will not rejoice in the death of one, not even an enemy." - Martin Luther King, Jr
I admire the sentiment. But something about it just strikes me as off, like that great Marx quote about the housing bubble that didn't appear anywhere in Das Kapital
Owners of capital will stimulate the working class to buy more and more of expensive goods, houses and technology, pushing them to take more and more expensive credits, until their debt becomes unbearable. The unpaid debt will lead to bankruptcy of banks, which will have to be nationalised, and the State will have to take the road which will eventually lead to communism. Karl Marx, Das Kapital, 1867
Like the Marx quote, it's a bit too a propos. What "thousands" would King have been talking about? In which enemy's death was he supposed to be rejoicing?
A quick google search turns up lots of tweets, all of them from today. Searching Martin Luther King Jr. quote pages for the word "enemy" does not turn up this quote, only things that probably wouldn't go over nearly so well, like "Love is the only force capable of transforming an enemy to a friend." I'm pretty sure that this quote, too, is fake.
What's fascinating is the speed of it. Someone made up a quote, attributed it to MLK jr, and disseminated it widely, all within 24 hours. Why? What do you get out of saying something pithy, and getting no credit for it?
Perhaps they only wanted to say this thing, and knew that no one would pay attention unless it came from someone else. Or, perhaps they are getting a gargantuan kick out of seeing people repeat their lie ad infinitum. Either way, it seems strange to me.
Reader Comments (2)
Now THIS surprised me. Out of all the things I expected you to be capable of (most of which are ruthless underhanded methods), I did not at all expect you to be narrow minded. Surely you don't really believe that just because there is no reference of something online doesn't mean it doesn't truly exist. That is such horse shit. That's like saying everything that's posted on the internet is real! What's next, are you going to tell me everything the news media reports is accurate?
The person who posted it originally didn't mean for the first part to be an MLK quote, but the last part is MLK. Someone copy/pasted and left out a quotation mark. Check this out: http://i.imgur.com/cqtjw.jpg